As it always happens, people realize there is something new is Redis in 2 years or more. With Streams it tragically took like 4 years and then everybody started to use it for this use case, with a sharp acceleration in the latest few years. I believe this is what is happening for vector sets as well. For a reduced size problem like that you just git clone Redis, add the vectors into a key with VADD, and query with VSIM. It's a 10 lines Python script that will deliver 20k/50k queries per second more or less, out of the box with zero optimizations.
But here the problem is: the scale. Millions of vectors. And I wonder if Redis should add on-disk vector sets, which I started to sketch months ago and never implemented. So my question is, the "3B" in Vicky's blog post is theoretical or is a practical need many folks have? I'm asking because at such a scale, the main problem is to generate the embeddings for your items, whatever they are.
> at such a scale, the main problem is to generate the embeddings for your items
Generation is often decoupled from querying, though. Consider LLMs, where training is a very expensive, slow, hardware intensive process, whereas inference is much faster and much less intensive.
But the performance of inference is in many ways more important than the performance of training, because inference is what users interact with directly.
Depending on how 'one-off' the query is, sequential read is the right answer. The alternative is indexing the data for ANN, which will generally require doing the equivalent of many queries across the dataset.
On the bright side, smart folks have already thought pretty hard about this. In my work, I ended up picking usearch for large-scale vector storage and ANN search. It's plenty fast and is happy working with vectors on disk - solutions which are /purely/ concerned with latency often don't include support for vectors on disk, which forces you into using a hell of a lot of RAM.
But here the problem is: the scale. Millions of vectors. And I wonder if Redis should add on-disk vector sets, which I started to sketch months ago and never implemented. So my question is, the "3B" in Vicky's blog post is theoretical or is a practical need many folks have? I'm asking because at such a scale, the main problem is to generate the embeddings for your items, whatever they are.
https://gist.github.com/antirez/b3cc9af4db69b04756606ad91cab...
Generation is often decoupled from querying, though. Consider LLMs, where training is a very expensive, slow, hardware intensive process, whereas inference is much faster and much less intensive.
But the performance of inference is in many ways more important than the performance of training, because inference is what users interact with directly.
On the bright side, smart folks have already thought pretty hard about this. In my work, I ended up picking usearch for large-scale vector storage and ANN search. It's plenty fast and is happy working with vectors on disk - solutions which are /purely/ concerned with latency often don't include support for vectors on disk, which forces you into using a hell of a lot of RAM.
https://github.com/unum-cloud/USearch