20 comments

  • alin23 5 hours ago
    Am I in the minority for thinking ScreenStudio is actually worth the money?

    The recent video I did for Cling for example (https://lowtechguys.com/cling) I’ve had many people ask about how I did it because it has just the right amount of motion and highlighting. I did it in a few minutes of editing in the ScreenStudio UI.

    I’m not saying it’s a great video, but people say it conveys the info well enough and that’s what matters. It would have taken me days to do the same with DaVinci Resolve because of my inexperience with complex editors.

    A $30/month subscription is indeed too much, but I see it as a one time payment for that month when I release something, then I pause the subscription. I need it rarely, very few videos need zooming and motion.

    Anyway I love to see alternatives like OpenScreen! What I would miss the most would be presets, not sure if it’s already there, but it’s a nice quality of life feature to have a consistent look to the motion effects between videos.

    • RestartKernel 5 hours ago
      I think it's mostly just that a subscription seems weird for a tool like this. Most users would probably only need it occasionally, and with a subscription you can't just add it to your toolbox to grab when that time comes.
      • edoceo 5 hours ago
        IMO a big disservice to the universe has been done with the recurring revenue drive. Many services could/should offer a one-shot option, with the highest margin. Somehow the world got stuck on SaaS model so hard that one off is completely ignored.

        I know why the capital class loves MRR I'm just mad that OTC is ignored.

      • alin23 5 hours ago
        For me it would make more sense to have something like “unlock for a week” if the dev wants to keep the ongoing revenue model. Of course a lifetime purchase is even better, not sure why that’s not an option.

        I would be happy to pay $100 for unlimited access and be locked into the current version of the app, maybe only have minor version updates free so you don’t get locked into a buggy version.

        But that’s a more complicated licensing model to implement I guess.

    • thatxliner 5 hours ago
      It used to not be a subscription, and like that it would've definitely have been worth the money
      • vochsel 2 hours ago
        +1 this, I bought it when it was a flat fee for a year of updates. That year's up now and I'd happily pay for another, but not as a subscription...
    • IshKebab 59 minutes ago
      I must be in the minority but I find that constant panning/zooming to be very distracting and almost dizzying. The sharp start of the easing curves is pretty awful too. I'm surprised people like it.

      I'd probably do it with arrows or fading out parts of the screen instead.

      • alin23 41 minutes ago
        A lot of the time it is, I agree. I would love the ability to do more highlighting and less panning. But in a small 700px wide video, zooming is kind of necessary to make it clear where the action is coming from. Because the app window is so large and packed.

        And these recording editors don’t have arrows and callouts, not even a freeze frame. I have to plan the recording to the letter and after 10 frustrating takes I just say fk it and try to polish the least confusing take

        Maybe I should start contributing to openscreen to get the ideal recording editor people are looking for instead of paying and complaining.

    • unicornporn 4 hours ago
      Uhm, but ScreenStufio is not available for Linux (or Windows for that matter)?

      OpenStudio apparently is and I'm hyped.

    • BoorishBears 3 hours ago
      > A $30/month subscription is indeed too much, but I see it as a one time payment for that month when I release something, then I pause the subscription. I need it rarely, very few videos need zooming and motion.

      If I think something is worth the money, I typically don't need to actively decide to pause the subscription each time I use it.

      • alin23 39 minutes ago
        Right, it’s not worth $30/month all year for me because I don’t use it past demo videos for when I publish a new app or large update. Which happens rarely.

        But if I was that kind of user who did demos monthly, the time saved on one or two videos that month is worth $30.

  • jiusanzhou 1 hour ago
    Smart choice using PixiJS for the rendering pipeline — WebGL gives you hardware-accelerated compositing for the zoom/pan effects without needing to shell out to ffmpeg for every preview frame. The auto-zoom feature alone makes this worth it for anyone doing quick product demos where you'd otherwise spend 20 minutes keyframing in a full NLE. Would love to see cursor click highlighting land at some point, that's the one Screen Studio feature I actually miss.
    • avinashselvam 55 minutes ago
      pixijs has been great for my saas as well. rendering is blazing fast compared to ffmpeg pipelines.
  • jlarks32 4 hours ago
    Looks awesome! Super excited to try it. What are pros / cons over Cap? https://cap.so/ - also open source https://github.com/CapSoftware/cap
    • csomar 2 hours ago
      This one is free even for commercial usage.
  • gargan 1 hour ago
    Also checkout https://screenix.studio/ if you're on Linux

    I just tried Open Screen but it didn't work on my machine (Cachy OS) - it didn't detect the screen or my microphone. Hopefully it gets better

  • ramkarthikk 1 hour ago
    I've been using this for the past month or so and have had nothing but positive experience. It's easy to use and works well. I wish the zoom was a slider instead of preset options, that way I could get finer control. Easily one of the best apps I found recently along with Handy.computer.
  • tuzemec 1 hour ago
    That's pretty cool!

    Btw, it seems that "How trimming works" screen has some missing translations.

  • fodkodrasz 2 hours ago
    I see that this is for MacOS. Isn't there a stock feature for screen recording, like on the iPhone, or on Windows (snipping tool can do screen recordings since Windows 10 or 11)?
  • josephcsible 8 hours ago
    Does this have any advantages over OBS Studio?
    • hackyhacky 7 hours ago
      Speaking as someone who has used both: yes. OBS is a general-purpose recording/streaming system. It gives you a lot of flexibility, but it can take some work to make things look "nice."

      Screen Studio (and so OpenScreen as well) are "opinionated" and are designed to create aesthetic videos with minimal configuration. They can't do a lot of the things that OBS can do, but if all you want is to record your desktop with a webcam overlay, it's a lot easier.

      • triilman 6 hours ago
        can it utilize my accelerator or GPU for best performance. and is it support kind of encode like av qucksync?
    • neoCrimeLabs 7 hours ago
      OBS is more focused on live-streaming, even if it can be general purpose.

      OpenScreen is more about screen recording, once recorded it turns into a simple-ish NLE that is focused on editing screen-casts.

    • gargan 1 hour ago
      It's the automatic zooming animations. I've not found any OBS scripts that can do this?
    • csomar 2 hours ago
      Yes. For me personally, I am only interested in creating short demo videos in as little time as possible. OBS is an advanced software that requires me to learn to use it.

      I just downloaded this and had a zoom effect video from the first attempt. The learning curve is roughly zero.

  • __mharrison__ 2 hours ago
    I'd rather have the metadata from click and typing events and use that to create a davinci project...
  • karimf 6 hours ago
    Nice project. I thought of building exactly this.

    Since it's much easier to port source code to other languages now, I'd love to see more projects like written in Swift, or C#.

  • mjmsmith 5 hours ago
    Curious how this compares to Recordly (https://recordly.dev)
  • Nevin1901 8 hours ago
    Thank you so much for making this. Screen studio was unbelievably expensive for what it was
  • dhruv3006 4 hours ago
    Great project - but screen studio is actually pretty awesome!
  • marktolson 7 hours ago
    Genuinely impressed with this! Thank you!
  • SilentM68 8 hours ago
    Nifty app!

    Just tried the AppImage version on Linux, simple to use, and works Ok on my end.

    Suggest you add preferences dropdown to floating bar, and ability to highlight parts of an area for record, ability to set the default save location or change it at will. Also noted that though I closed the app via the customary way, and removed the AppImage, the apps ICON remained present in GNOME's notification area.

    Will keep an eye on its progress since OBS (what I used) seems to have stopped receiving updates :)

    • josephcsible 8 hours ago
      > OBS (what I used) seems to have stopped receiving updates :)

      No it hasn't: https://github.com/obsproject/obs-studio/commits/master/

      • SilentM68 4 hours ago
        Hmm, for the longest time, the Flatpak version of the app in my Linux OS was warning me that a particular older org.freedesktop.Platform runtime was end of life, and that OBS project should update their compatibility hence OBS was being classified as a security risk during the update process.

        Having said that, and reading your reply, I stand corrected and I take it back as I did an update and the error is nowhere to be found. Not sure how the runtime was updated to the latest, 25.08, but assume it was the obs project.

        :)

  • youniverse 8 hours ago
    Now we need an open source self hostable Loom.
    • crummy 7 hours ago
      Haven’t tried it, but here is one: https://github.com/MarconLP/snapify
      • DougMerritt 5 hours ago
        1. It says it is $8/month, which is not mentioned on the github page, so I had been thinking it was free in addition to being AGPL-3.0; it links to https://snapify.it/ which is where I see the fee.

        2. It says "for everyone" but looks like it might be Linux-specific, and it doesn't say anything about which OSes are supported.

        • josephcsible 3 hours ago
          IIUC, the fee is just to use their instance, and hosting your own instance is actually free. Also, it looks like the client side of it runs in a browser, so it will support pretty much any OS.
  • I_am_tiberius 18 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • volume_tech 7 hours ago
    [dead]
  • colesantiago 8 hours ago
    Thanks to open source and AI, we don't need every software to be a subscription or an enshittified SaaS.

    Screen Studio at $29/mo is unusually and extremely expensive for a video recorder app, and not counting the fact that it is proprietary, which means they can change pricing at any time.

    Thanks for building this.

    • danpasca 7 hours ago
      Yep. I've had ChatGPT build many simple python scripts or browser extensions that I can use for free instead of paying for subscriptions that shouldn't be subscriptions in the first place.
  • mc7alazoun 8 hours ago
    Thanks for sharing! I'll give it a go and send back my feedback.