10 comments

  • Cider9986 2 hours ago
    The 8th highest voted HN submission is on mechanical watches. I imagine that's the type the watchmaking school involves themself with because afaik all high end watches are mechanical.

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31261533 4 years ago 413 comments

    They have a certain beauty in their intricate details working together for function. I do really like looking at the glass back which shows some details and you can see the piece that move to gain power.

    Although it seems youd have to pay a lot to get an accurate one because I have a $250 mechanical Seiko and its time keeping is junk. It was mediocre when I got it and has gotten worse. It was $150 when I bought it so I suppose it would have been a good investment if it hadn't got beat up.

    • AdamN 6 minutes ago
      > all high end watches are mechanical.

      No, most high end male jewelry are mechanical watches (and much of women-oriented jewelry as well).

      High end watches are such a solved problem we don't even talk about them anymore. Either the G-shock, the Garmin watches, or the Apple Watch run circles around mechanical watches in terms of functionality with each satisfying a different niche (100% self-contained, long lived smart functionality, glance-oriented integration with full-stack personal tech ecosystem).

    • gleenn 13 minutes ago
      If you are using a mechanical watch to keep time (accurately for long) you are doing it wrong
  • pizzaballs 2 minutes ago
    Enjoy till ai with robot arm take your job..
  • sleepyguy 5 hours ago
    My grandfather was a master watchmaker and jeweler who learned his trade in the Soviet Union and then in Europe. After emigrating to Toronto after the war, he opened his own jewelry store, where he repaired watches and clocks, as well as crafted and repaired fine jewelry.

    He was a true master of his craft and built a successful business based on his exceptional skill. He Was well known for his craftsmanship and his remarkable ability to repair virtually any watch or clock, no matter how complex.

    Jewelers from across the city would bring him pieces that no one else could repair. For antique and vintage timepieces, he would often fabricate tiny replacement parts by hand when originals were no longer available. When he retired, very large companies would still come to his home to repair incredibly expensive pieces. He liked to tinker and would quietly work in his little home shop, pipe burning, radio playing, and visitors coming throughout the day to have him fix things.

    When he passed, he had 10's of 1000's of watch parts in all these little bags that were all tagged and in boxes. We ended up giving them away to one of his customers who own several Jewelry stores. Had I known I would have offered them to this school along with 100's of watches he kept for parts.

    • p1necone 5 hours ago
      My father was a watchmaker. Fond memories of going with him in his van to the various jewellers he did work for picking up and dropping off. I remember being given a big metal lamp from his workshop when he passed away and realising the body of the lamp was not isolated from the incoming power, although luckily not at mains voltage (not what killed him).
      • brador 1 hour ago
        Maybe it was a touch lamp? (Like a clapper but works when you touch the body not through sound)
        • p1necone 1 hour ago
          Not unless touch lamps are supposed to give you an electric shock :)
          • brador 1 hour ago
            Some of the older/cheaper ones did/do give a slight shock! It was a different time. (They worked by detecting a change in resistance).
    • culopatin 3 hours ago
      Is this still a viable career?
      • cik 2 hours ago
        It depends on what you consider viable, and your level.

        As someone in love with fountain pens and ink, I can tell you that there are absolutely wealthy pen turners, private designers, and the same with watches.

        • noufalibrahim 1 hour ago
          I'm glad fountain pens came up here. There's a shop a few hours away from where I stay in an old town in India called the "Pen Hospital". It was a thriving business in the 60s when my father went to college. Lots of people came there mostly to repair fountain pens. He's mostly just a stationery store right now but if you take a fountain pen there for repair, he does it for free just as a nod to the tradition I guess.
          • ricardobayes 1 hour ago
            My friend told me when he visited India that they repair everything over there: it's a beautiful thing IMO
            • noufalibrahim 51 minutes ago
              That's an exaggeration. Things are not as repairable as they used to be and people are not as thrifty as they used to be. However, I do think the culture of repairing things is strong and mostly financially motivated.
      • edm0nd 1 hour ago
        highly doubtful if it was your career and you are just starting

        probably would make more $ from it if you were a YouTuber or TikTok creator and did "watchmaking" content.

      • crdrost 2 hours ago
        I mean people do make a living doing it, but my understanding is that it requires a lot of hustle—as a hobbyist you can just take your time and meditate and take a million pictures, but if you're trying to make a living you have to focus on volume, volume, volume... So you have to have a system, this one goes in the cleaner and you are immediately disassembling the next, another is in a tray next to the machine that tells you how fast or slow it's ticking... It is maybe less glamorous than it first sounds.
        • culopatin 2 hours ago
          Can one end up working for TAG out of this for example? What does it take for that career ladder to happen?
          • AdamN 4 minutes ago
            Probably going to the school above is a good start.
          • sodastar 30 minutes ago
            [dead]
  • 14 6 hours ago
    As a Canadian cool! Never heard of this school before but on the west coast so probably why.

    I've watched many watch repair videos online and the knowledge base required is huge. Also there are many tools needed which are not cheap. There is just so much to know that takes years to learn. Very cool that the knowledge is being shared and the skill passed on. In my small town there was only one guy who worked on clocks and watches. He passed a while back and his kids continue with his jewelry store but they now send out watches and clocks to another business as none of his kids learned how to do it.

  • LzeYing 5 hours ago
    I believe this is exactly the kind of high-paying job that is difficult for AI to replace.
    • gleenn 10 minutes ago
      Correct, AI will not replathe 3 high-paying watch maker jobs that exist. You are the best kind of correct, technically. But you are distracting from the fact that most people aren't doing anything even remotely physical related in the space that some people posit will be decimated by AI: white-collar jobs where you are a keyboard jockey all day.
    • seemaze 4 hours ago
      Mechanical timepieces are a luxury item, and these students are essentially artists in training. Wrist time was solved in the late 1970's with the commoditization of quartz movements. These 'jobs' will get replaced by AI at approximately the same pace as your local sculptor.
      • Analemma_ 4 hours ago
        I don't know if watchmaking is one of them, but there are a bunch of traditional crafts which are actually approaching a danger point because there aren't enough up-and-coming acolytes in the discipline to replace them, even though the craft still enjoys enough popular support to have a thriving economy.

        Anecdotally, I see enough mechanical watches on wrists and in duty-free shops that I imagine there's enough of a pipeline there for at least one school. Much like vinyl records it doesn't appear to actually be going away even if it's superfluous.

      • LzeYing 4 hours ago
        Come to think of it, it makes sense; in this day and age, every industry is evolving so rapidly that the future remains quite uncertain.
    • Cthulhu_ 25 minutes ago
      Yes, and it's a great example of an industry that was completely decimated by automation - you can get a functional watch for a fiver, whereas back when every watch was handmade and a de-facto inheritance piece.

      But bespoke, handmade, high value, low volume stuff is still around.

    • jameshart 4 hours ago
      I am literally wearing a watch right now that was produced without any of these artisans’ specialized labor and which boasts among its features access to AI.

      In a very real sense I have replaced use of the skills of watchmakers with AI.

      Sorry about that. To be fair most watchmakers were already put out of work by quartz oscillators and integrated circuits in the 1980s.

      • shit_game 1 hour ago
        The reason that you bought your watch and the reason that other people buy these hand crafted mechanical watches are very, very different. Once upon a time, utility used to be what necessitated an accurate movement, and it came at great cost because of the skill, knowledge, precision, and artistic talent needed to make one; this justified further embellishing the movement with a beautiful case and band because it would be in poor taste to make something that is both expensive and ugly when your primary consumers would be aristocrats. Eventually timepieces became commodified as industrialization made their manufacture feasible at a larger scale, and later then the advent of the quartz crystal made mechanical movements functionally obsolete as a means of telling time accurately. Approaching perfect timekeeping in a mechanical movement is not meant to be utilitarian, but rather a practice in artistry. Mechanical watches are jewelry, and jewelry irrationally commands the price that any luxury does because it's a matter of taste and not utility. Nobody buying a Patek Philippe is doing so because they want millisecond accuracy via atmoic clock GPS signals - they buy Seikos for that.
        • DiscourseFan 22 minutes ago
          I think the fact that you can have a compact device on your wrist that accurately keeps time all without any battery or circuitry is really remarkable as well. Moreover that the “technology superior” smart watches are kind of distracting and don’t have a great deal of use value. My watch tells the time and the date, that’s really all I need it for
      • soperj 3 hours ago
        you need AI to tell the time?
        • rvba 1 hour ago
          Suprising amount of people do not know how to read time from the "classical" watches and clocks (those with hands).

          Reason is very simple - they dont own clocks with hands when theh are kids.

      • keiferski 2 hours ago
        Not really. No one wants a Rolex or Omega with ChatGPT in it.
    • ricardobayes 1 hour ago
      I don't know how high paying it is, although I can see how it can be, especially given there is a shortage of watchmakers in the developed world, even in Switzerland.
    • annzabelle 4 hours ago
      I have a friend who got an English and Creative Writing degree from a liberal arts college, and then immediately went back to trade school for band instrument repair. It's not particularly lucrative, as trades go, but it does seem a lot more future proof than most careers.
      • hn_throwaway_99 2 hours ago
        I recently left my career as a software engineer to train to become a violin maker. Couldn't be happier.
      • LzeYing 4 hours ago
        Haha, so you're going to do something AI can't replace, right?
        • annzabelle 3 hours ago
          Thinking about it. I'm pretty attracted to the idea of a career with some kind of protectionist licensing system, like doctor or actuary, but that may just be staving off the inevitable. Might teach high school.

          After I got laid off in the US, I moved to a mountain town in New Zealand planning on being a ski lift operator while I think about the future, but got a software developer job by accident instead.

    • stouset 5 hours ago
      Sure but it’s also a microscopically small component of the country’s overall economy.
      • zuzululu 4 hours ago
        canada's economy is roughly slightly below Mississipi with increasing amount of migration from third world countries putting strain on its resources and with almost no plans other than to tax the already overstretched middle class

        its almost the exact dilemma in Western Europe except the only saving grace is military security is guaranteed by its larger and richer neighbor

        • sanswork 4 hours ago
          Canada's GDP is $2.2t vs $165b for Mississippi. Immigration rate is decreasing.
          • zuzululu 2 hours ago
            thanks for bringing this up and I have to reiterate the importance of per capita which is something that is curiously ignored in these discussions but I'm sure you know the difference from just measuring GDP alone and just forgot about it

            Canada's nominal GDP per capita is roughly $53,800 USD, which places it nearly on par with Mississippi

            also Canada admits people from third world countries at a per-capita rate roughly four times higher than the United States, with none of the enforcement agencies capable of tackling illegal immigration which a lot of this demographic engages in. It's difficult for ICE now imagine Canada which has no such enforcement on the same scale

            my point is that Canada has a smaller economy but imports more from the third world than its much richer and powerful neighbor.

            this is not a sustainable arrangement.

        • wasabi991011 4 hours ago
          > canada's economy is roughly slightly below Mississipi

          No, it isn't. Not true in absolute terms, not true per capita, not true adjusted for purchasing power.

          • vlovich123 2 hours ago
            It is true per capita in USD dollars due to the weak Canadian dollar. Mississippi has better purchasing power
            • zuzululu 1 hour ago
              absolutely. its the "poorest" state too
        • ipaddr 4 hours ago
    • keiferski 3 hours ago
      Basically anything that is a luxury good is probably safe from AI. If people are buying it for status or high performance reasons, they aren’t going to pick the low end AI slop version.
    • numbersfollow67 4 hours ago
      Unless they’re replaced by humans controlled by AI(look at the various research for BCIs or for gene therapy that allows for the possibility for you to be controlled by radio frequencies), then they’re very easily replaced.
      • matheusmoreira 3 hours ago
        > gene therapy that allows for the possibility for you to be controlled by radio frequencies

        What. Can you cite this research?

  • throwatdem12311 4 hours ago
    Maybe I will take up watchmaking when I get sick of AI slop programming and offshore morons going wild with a Claude subscription.
    • ggm 2 hours ago
      If you read about Harrison's Chronometers you read of Rupert T. Gould who suffered a Nervous Breakdown, and it is said fell into watch repair as therapy, bringing them back to life.
  • ButlerianJihad 6 hours ago
    Yes, but has it taken a licking?
  • ElenaDaibunny 5 hours ago
    kid me thought AI would replace people doing insanely precise hand work. turns out it replaced me writing emails, and this school's still going strong after 80 years. lmao we got played
    • throwatdem12311 4 hours ago
      AI was supposed to do my laundry so that I could make art and code for fun but now the AI is coding and making art while I do laundry.
      • DigiEggz 4 hours ago
        Profound and painful statement.
      • ElenaDaibunny 4 hours ago
        yep,sci-fi really got this one wrong lol.
    • dghlsakjg 4 hours ago
      Give the Chinese some time.

      They are doing incredible things with world models, and have an economy that really could do incredible things with robots wired to effective world models.

      It won't surprise me at all if in 10 years LLMs are less of a big deal than world models

  • rohitsriram 4 hours ago
    [flagged]
  • Ozzie-D 6 hours ago
    [flagged]