Google Search lets creators know more about their reach

(theverge.com)

36 points | by herbertl 3 days ago

7 comments

  • xnx 2 minutes ago
  • 062570864389 0 minutes ago
    "Creators"?

    So, artisans, metalworkers, engineers?

  • harkdif 3 days ago
    It may just be me, but I find googles search console surprisingly inaccurate or at least hard to parse. Even the data within it is often conflicting and I'm not sure why the results show as they do. Things like it will show a click through rate for specific pages but have no correlation to the search terms that drove that click, yet show impressions for the page far beyond what it shows for terms. Can't imagine it will be better for something as hard to track as creator tracking cross-platform.
    • xnx 8 minutes ago
      This is mostly by design. Google doesn't want it to be possible to deanonymize the data.
  • jasonvorhe 1 hour ago
    Reading about anything Google Search in 2026 gives off some Yahoo vibes around 2006.
    • cwillu 1 hour ago
      I noticed yesterday that they've managed to make editing the text field on their search page lag and flip/reorder characters entered during the edit: editing “foot pedal” into “foot pedal keyboard” became “foot pedal oardkeyb”
      • andybp85 27 minutes ago
        having coded with several RTEs, this just triggered some PTSD
    • e40 1 hour ago
      Also gives off desperation vibes with Google finally doing some innovation on their monopolistic product now that it’s losing market share to AI.
      • chias 25 minutes ago
        That and it's wild to celebrate innovation that was literally default behavior 20 years ago, which they themselves worked hard to break.

        Used to be you'd look at your server logs and see referrer headers of google.com/?q=search+terms

        Then they broke that (deliberately, well before cross origin header concerns were a thing) so you'd have to sign up for their webmaster tools.

        • airza 24 minutes ago
          I don’t think google should be held responsible for “breaking” this. It was crazy that one website got to see what i was doing on a second completely unrelated website.
          • lelandfe 0 minutes ago
            "I came here from there" does not seem crazy and the two locations are inherently related.
          • xnx 4 minutes ago
            Yep. There was all kinds of data a user could enter into Google search and unknowingly share with a search result site. Sucks for "SEOs", but great for users.
      • cjbgkagh 1 hour ago
        They made search worse on purpose to make more money, then tried to gaslight everyone by blaming SEO. It was getting rather hard to find things with it, I would have to explain to people that search wasn’t always this bad. I have negative sympathy for them.
        • p-e-w 55 minutes ago
          If they indeed made search worse “on purpose”, there should be plenty of alternatives with better results. I’ve tried about a dozen of them, including paid ones like Kagi, and found the quality of results to be universally worse than Google’s, especially for niche searches where it matters the most.
          • cjbgkagh 25 minutes ago
            It takes a huge amount of money to compete with Google in search and all Google has to do to destroy that investment is to dial back the sandbagging. They really did have a moat.
          • weird-eye-issue 43 minutes ago
            Your logic makes no sense. Just because something is worse relative to how it used to be does not mean alternatives are now better than it.
  • tchalla 1 hour ago
    Does everyone see this? I can’t.
    • khurs 1 hour ago
      what do you mean? See what?
      • tchalla 32 minutes ago
        The option that’s talked about on the main post.
  • orionblastar 3 days ago
    Mirror without Paywall: https://archive.is/fcl2T
  • sylware 2 hours ago
    Please gogol, stop being super evil, restore interop with noscript/basic HTML web engines.