It wouldn't require perfect accuracy, just rough accuracy and a human to confirm, and it's already more than good enough for that. I do not understand this confusion surrounding modern math.
Here's the thing about economists... The loudest ones don't want to be correct, they want to be influential. The ones who can actually make good predictions work for banks and hedge funds lol.
Letting companies get away with applying token limits etc. is ridiculous. The electricity is not the bottleneck (taxpayers subsidize it). The knowledge was stolen from artists and writers. It's a logic gate on tool use determining if you're in the right economic class.
2 comments